infor.com
concierge
infor u
developer portal
Home
Groups
Lawson - Human Resources Customer Community [READ ONLY]
LP: Limiting usage of sick time per calendar year
Legacy Contributor
We are in process of setting up Sick Plans for our Seattle and Portland part-time employees based on the Sick Time ordinances using Lawson Absence Management.
It appears that the 'usage' needs to be limited to 72 hours for Seattle and 40 hours for Portland per calendar year. The Seattle ordinance has clear caps on use and carryover but no cap on accrual. It's looking like we need to cap the usage and yearly carryover.
Has anyone had to set up new plans recently for these two ordinances? And if so, how are you dealing with limiting the usage and not the accrual? I am very familiar with carryover but I’m not finding anywhere in the LP set up where I can limit the amount of days/hours that can be physically used during the calendar year.
Any information you can share would be appreciated.
Find more posts tagged with
Infor Lawson Human Resources Group - Discussion
Comments
g-martin
You are correct you cannot directly limit usage within LP. You could setup a structure so that hours accrue toward the next year and have the eligibility rule setup to only flip (occurance at bottom) hours from Accrued to Available once/yr. That could limit usage to what an EE accrued during the previous year. Or perhaps an easier route is to limit usage within a year in your time keeping system. This functionality would depend on what system you use. I'm finalizing our Portland, Seattle & you missed Jersey City, NJ. I will post what I've built in a couple of days.
Legacy Contributor
Thank you for your response. I will look forward to seeing what you ended up building out. In the meantime, I will look into if our time keeping system could help us manage the limit on usage.
g-martin
I've been a little busy with year end and all but as promised attached LP201 details our build for Portland, Jersey City and I've included Seattle as someone asked for that one. Note for all you will need to determine your definition of "All Hours Worked" Service Class. If anyone else has the San Fransicso PTO as well note that SF specifically states EE's DO NOT accrue against time off so that Service Class should exclude your "usage" codes. Also, we chose to just enforce the Eligibility on the days as you can't do both the 240 hrs & the days in the eligibility rule. Plus for us our EE Group criteria weeds out anyone that would fall below that level. Finally, as with any of these plans some of the nuiances can be enterpreted differently so everyone needs to decide how they are going to enforce it. But these builds will get you started.
Legacy Contributor
Thank you for posting your build. We are simply going with 'days' for eligibility as well as initial review for setting up both seemed difficult. Also, most of our part-times are up into that amount for hours worked anyhow.
Thanks again!
Attachment_4233.zip
Maximizing Interactivity in Birst Dashboards.pptx
Legacy Contributor
Ken, how will you be handling rehires within 6 or 7 months (depending on ordinance) and whether or not they previously met service requirements for 'usage'. Also, would you be counting previous service time before 1/1/14 for Portland or before 9/1/12 for Seattle?
Quick Links
All Categories
Recent Posts
Activity
Unanswered
Groups
Help
Popular Tags
Infor Lawson Human Resources Group - Discussion
Infor Lawson Technology Group - Discussion
General Discussions
VISUAL - Enterprise General Discussions
Infor Lawson Supply Chain Management - Discussion
Process Automation (IPA) - General Discussions
Pegasus - Partner General Discussions
Infor Lawson Supply Chain Group - Discussion
Infor Lawson Financials Group - Discussion
Infor EPM Discussions