Level Data in Intercompany stnadard Reports

Hello,

It would be interesting to include a combo to select "Level Data" in the next standard reports:

Intercompany Reconciliation Status.
Intercompany Matching Detail Cons. Debts
Intercompany Matching Detail Cons. Expenditure/Revenue

Because, if not, the data included in these reports don´t include entity journals because these reports use the HB I Level data.

this choice exists in Reports "Account Reconciliation (Intercompany)" and "Intercompany Matching Detail - Overview"

Thanks a lot and best regards.

com_monthly_proactive_201004.pdf

Find more posts tagged with

Enhancement Request Discussions

Comments

John Robson

I will bring this to the attention of one of the FinCon Business Analysts as she was talking about the design of Interco matching screens yesterday. Meantime please raise an Enhancement Request.

Adolf Staudigl

Hi Luis, this has already been fixed in the March release. IC reconciliation reports should now use HB III (C element which aggregates data from all data levels as well as all journal entries).

In my opinion, we should not add an additional selection for the level in these standard reports.

Perhaps you could share your use cases where such an additional selection would add value for the business user?

unknown

Hi Adi,

Yesterday we have just reviewed this issue in release March2023, and the conclussion is that in the 3 first reports:(Intercompany Reconciliation Status; Intercompany Matching Detail Cons.Debts and Expenditure/Revenue) the level data taken is HBI Total, not HB III.

In the other 2 reports (Account Reconciliation Intercompany and Intercompany Matching Detail-Overview), there is the combo with the levels, so there is no issue.

In the first 3 reports, we consider 2 possibilities: 1.include the combo with the data levels, or that the level data taken should be HB III, in order to include all the journals.

If you want, we can organize a short meeting to show you how journals aren´t included.in first 3 reports.

I raised an ER for this issue, this is the number: 94.133

We keep in contact!

Thanks a lot for the support and best regards.

Adolf Staudigl

Topic is covered in your incident #16917468, isnt't it?

In this case this is fixed with the April release - I mixed that up, sorry!

Copyright © 2025 Infor. All rights reserved.