infor.com
concierge
infor u
developer portal
Posts
Categories
Groups
Hubs
Developer
Healthcare
Hospitality
Public Sector
CloudSuites
Aerospace & Defense (LN)
Automotive (LN)
Chemicals (M3)
Corporate (FSM/HRT)
Distribution (Sx.e/CSD)
Distribution Enterprise (M3)
Engineering & Construction (LN)
Fashion (M3)
Food & Beverage (M3)
Healthcare (FSM/HRT)
Industrial (Syteline/CSI)
Industrial Enterprise (LN)
Manufacturing (M3)
Public Sector (FSM/HRT)
Solutions
Supply Chain Management (SCM)
Human Capital Management (HCM)
Events
Groups
Your Groups
User Groups
Migrated Forums
FSM/HCM/S3 - Infor Lawson 10.x
HCM/S3 - Learning and Development
HCM/S3 - Global HR
HCM/S3 - Talent Acquisition
HR Service Delivery
Human Capital Management (HCM) - EMEA
Infor Configuration Management for Service Industries
Lawson - Business Intelligence
Lawson - Financials
Lawson - Human Resources
Lawson - Supply Chain
Lawson - Supply Chain Management
Lawson - Technology
MSCM on Landmark
About
Community News
Email Community Support
Home
Groups
FACTS - Partner Community
SO Posting to SA
Legacy Contributor
We have a customer that recently had a couple of invoices post everywhere EXCEPT SA. Has anyone run into this? Does anyone know what reasons there might be for a Publish failure (since there's no notification included in SOR318)?
I've already checked the KB, and no, they're not running a parallel test system. These were part of a regular DSR; they just didn't get published into SA.
Find more posts tagged with
Comments
salbritton
Make sure you have entered the [API-Publ] key in API Key Code Entry (on the SM4 menu, where User Code F/M is). S/A will post all invoices still in SOHSOH and SOHSOL te next time the DSR is run.
Legacy Contributor
Not a problem there. Again, it was just 2 invoices among the hundreds (if not thousands) they have processed since installing 7.6. There is NO trace of them whatsoever in SA. They posted everywhere else, and they're not in the SO hold files anymore, because FACTS thinks they have been posted.
sabeen-kaleem
do you have a test database and are the API settings pointing to the live database? If so, live transactions can post to the test system. You need to use relative pathing in your polling and output setting in system control.
Legacy Contributor
I have a customer with the exact same issue. One thing I have noticed is that there are unposted files in the FACTS API Polling directories.
Legacy Contributor
Is SMU954 running? If not, that could explain why there are unposted files in the polling directory.
greimer
Another issue to watch out for is the running of SMU954 more than once. It seems that an invoice or two may be skipped as the multiple instances of SMU954 may try to extract a non-existant record for SA, not find it, and then each WRITE their own version. The one who writes last, I think, wins. Early on in the use of API calls, I remember being told I could run it more than once to "speed things up", something I do not think we have ever found necessary.
Important Links
Community Hubs
Discussion Forums
Groups
Community News
Popular Tags
CPQ: Ask a Colleague
FAQs, How-To, and Best Practices
Idea
Infor OS Portal
UI Design
CPQ: Tips and Tricks
Infor Homepages
Widget Development
Infor EPM Migration
Infor Ming.le