infor.com
concierge
infor u
developer portal
Posts
Categories
Groups
Hubs
Developer
Healthcare
Hospitality
Public Sector
CloudSuites
Aerospace & Defense (LN)
Automotive (LN)
Chemicals (M3)
Corporate (FSM/HRT)
Distribution (Sx.e/CSD)
Distribution Enterprise (M3)
Engineering & Construction (LN)
Fashion (M3)
Food & Beverage (M3)
Healthcare (FSM/HRT)
Industrial (Syteline/CSI)
Industrial Enterprise (LN)
Manufacturing (M3)
Public Sector (FSM/HRT)
Solutions
Supply Chain Management (SCM)
Human Capital Management (HCM)
Events
Groups
Your Groups
User Groups
Migrated Forums
FSM/HCM/S3 - Infor Lawson 10.x
HCM/S3 - Learning and Development
HCM/S3 - Global HR
HCM/S3 - Talent Acquisition
HR Service Delivery
Human Capital Management (HCM) - EMEA
Infor Configuration Management for Service Industries
Lawson - Business Intelligence
Lawson - Financials
Lawson - Human Resources
Lawson - Supply Chain
Lawson - Supply Chain Management
Lawson - Technology
MSCM on Landmark
About
Community News
Email Community Support
Home
Groups
FACTS - Partner Community
API / SMU954 Issue
joe
I have a custom procedure that creates an xml out to the web and an xml is sent back from the web which is processed through the API. The problem is the xml response comes back with a record id to keep things synced up and tries to write to the Contact F/M and the user is still on the record. I know that the API functions the same as if a user is setting at a keyboard entering the data and two people can not edit the same record. This causes a problem with the listener which renames the xml with a .x but it does a hard stop on the listener. (kills SMU954) Has anyone else run across this issue and come up with a fix?
Find more posts tagged with
Comments
Legacy Contributor
are you able to turn off soft locking on the F/M?
Legacy Contributor
TU 16782 which will be out in the 7.7.5 incremental may take care of this for you.
SMF999
12005 if use_soft_locking$<>"Y" or (%_run_bg and %_publish_only) then ok=1; goto *return
joe
Tim@ This current issue is with a customer on 7.6 and I do not see the soft lock flag. Is there anyway to stop SMU954/SMU955 from doing a hard stop for record locks and pop message type errors? Can you not just leave the .x in place and go on to the next file?
Stephanie@ I'm not sure that (%_run_bg and %_publish_only) will take care of the issue either. FM updates through the API are not going to be a %_publish_only process is it? ? ?
I looked at the code in SMC270, but did not see any logic that would allow the update. I don't think the user term_id and user_code are going to match up with the API process.
Important Links
Community Hubs
Discussion Forums
Groups
Community News
Popular Tags
CPQ: Ask a Colleague
FAQs, How-To, and Best Practices
Idea
Infor OS Portal
UI Design
CPQ: Tips and Tricks
Infor Homepages
Widget Development
Infor EPM Migration
Infor Ming.le